New Politics Program Links:   Home · Information · Projects · Publications · Media

Model City Charter Revision Project - Eighth Edition

Option Memo

Issue: Initiative and Referendum

Seventh Edition: Section 6.03, in brackets, states "The powers of initiative and referendum are hereby reserved to the electors of the city." A statement in bold-faced type follows, explaining that the section is in brackets because not all states allow initiative and referendum, and not all cities choose to adopt it.

Section 8.01(d) additionally provides that "Amendments to this charter may be framed and proposed: . . . (d) By the voters of the city."

The meeting summary from the first Model Charter Revision Committee raised the issue of structural changes to address the concerns of disaffected groups looking outside of government via initiatives, and the use of initiative and referendum by special interests.

Background: The initiative process allows citizens to adopt ordinances or amend the city charter. The referendum process allows citizens to reject ordinances or charter amendments proposed by the city council. A referendum can be binding or non-binding. Initiative and referendum are primary mechanisms of direct democracy. According to the 1996 ICMA Municipal Form of Government Survey, 58.1% of U.S. cities have the initiative process, 41.6% have binding referendums, and 39.8% have non-binding referendums.

Pros of Initiative and Referendum: Initiatives allow citizens to effect change they want when their elected officials are unwilling or unable to do it themselves. By empowering citizens to pass laws, it alleviates voter frustration with the political process. Initiative and referendum serves as an important check on the power of the legislative branch.

Cons of Initiative and Referendum: Initiative and referendum has grass roots, but the roots have grown in a market environment of high costs where special interests buy laws.

Two Options: The Committee should adopt one of the following positions by the end of the March 22 meeting:

  1. The language in § 6.03 of the Model should be taken out of brackets to help show its importance in the local political process.
  2. The language in § 6.03 of the Model should remain in brackets, reminding readers that initiative and referendum may not be possible in every city.

<< Back to the Model City Charter Revision Project Home

Copyright © 2007- National Civic League
email us: ncl@ncl.org
Web Design by xAx graphics