Model City Charter Committee
Conference Call Summary
Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2001
The Model City Charter Revision Committee was convened
by its chair, Betty Jane Narver, for a one hour conference call at 11 a.m.
Eastern on Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2001, to discuss process and other issues. A full
roll call was not taken; however, present during part or all of the call were
Eric Anderson, Linda Barton, Terrell Blodgett, John Buechner, Jacqueline Byers,
Greg Crosby, Jim Dailey, Mony Flores-Bauer, Scott Fosler, George Frederickson,
Chris Gates, Charles Gossett, Bill Hansell, James Keene (represented), Bob
Kipp, David Miller, Sy Murray, Bob O'Neill, Tanis Salant, Phil Schenck, David
Schultz, and Jim Svara. The call was facilitated by Derek Okubo and Bill Schechter.
The call began with a brief discussion of information sources and dissemination.
The National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration is
having a panel on the charter reform process at its conference, most likely
to occur on the morning of Friday, Oct. 26th. One comment called for a more
prominent display on the National Civic League web site of the charter section.
The next portion of the call focused on ways of enhancing the charter revision
process. Participants suggested holding at least one additional meeting because
electronic and teleconference means of communication are insufficient. A participant
suggested the conversation should be organized around a series of decision
memos on key issues, including the process and utilization of the model, and
direct democracy aspects like initiative, referendum, and recall. Participants
briefly discussed the lexicon of charters, and whether to have different versions
for different situations.
Other topics included the role of the committee in making decisions, and
an emphasis that this process has been historically a collaborative one without
voting. Regardless, the participants felt more face to face time would be
useful, with technology as a supplementary instead of primary means of communication.
After this focus on process, the participants discussed the agenda for the
December 7th meeting in Atlanta. Participants felt the target audience would
determine what the final product would look like, and that the committee should
pay more attention to deciding who that audience should be.
The participants discussed the desirability of breaking into small groups
at the second meeting. The callers who spoke on this topic supported the idea,
saying that to focus on the first three articles of the charter would necessitate
smaller groups. Others said that it was easier to express ideas in small groups.
Some participants asked NCL to explore getting a smaller group together in
Atlanta during the week of the National League of Cities conference before
the Dec. 7th charter meeting and attempt to sharpen some of the issues for
discussion. NCL will contact committee members regarding interest and potential
times.
The participants discussed where to hold a March/April meeting, with Denver,
Washington D.C., and Phoenix (in connection with the American Society for
Public Administration's conference) emerging as options. The participants
felt a survey should go to the whole committee to determine the most feasible
date and site.
|